<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 15 May 2008 03:28:37 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/"><rss:title>'Trebor Scholz' Blog'</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/</rss:link><rss:description>blog on art, technology, theory and activism</rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2008-05-15T03:28:37Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2008/5/13/beth-coleman-free-culture-and-the-network-effect.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/29/our-book-is-finally-out.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/28/good-practices-and-mobile-social-networking.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/14/web-20-ethics.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/8/motivations-for-participation.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/10/3/the-web-20-ideology.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/9/26/a-history-of-the-social-web.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/9/26/the-participatory-turn-in-social-life-online.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/9/25/the-lives-of-others.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/9/23/playing-class-struggle.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2008/5/13/beth-coleman-free-culture-and-the-network-effect.html"><rss:title>Beth Coleman, Free Culture, and the Network Effect</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2008/5/13/beth-coleman-free-culture-and-the-network-effect.html</rss:link><dc:creator>[Trebor]</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-05-13T21:14:37Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="sizeGreater20">About two weeks ago I had the pleasure of speaking at MIT's <a href="http://www.zonesofemergency.net/2008/04/22/ntone-ejabe-trebor-scholz-on-a-conversational-revolution-in-the-joan-jonas-performance-hall/" target="_blank">Zones of Emergency</a>. </span><span class="sizeGreater20">Like at previous occasions I tremendously enjoyed discussions there; what an inspiring intellectual community. </span><br /><span class="sizeGreater20"><br />  <div id="__ss_402473" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;"><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,29,0" width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=mit0508-1210689160185073-9" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="wmode" value="" /><embed src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=mit0508-1210689160185073-9" wmode="" quality="high" menu="false" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><div style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px;"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/?src=embed"><img alt="SlideShare" style="border: 0px none ; margin-bottom: -5px;" src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/logo_embd.png" /></a> | <a title="View 'Zones of Emergency Talk Treborscholz' on SlideShare" href="http://www.slideshare.net/trebor/zones-of-emergency-talk-treborscholz?src=embed">View</a> |</div></div>   After the presentation I had an email exchange with <strong><a target="_blank" href="http://web.mit.edu/cms/People/coleman.html">Dr. Beth Coleman</a></strong> who is professor in Writing and Humanistic Studies and Comparative Media Studies at MIT. Her research interests include virtual world design and use, networked subjectivity, global media emergence and practice in China, India and Africa, contemporary art and technology, and critical history of race and technology. She blogs at <a target="_blank" href="http://projectgoodluck.com/blog/index.php">Project Goodluck</a>.<br /><br /><strong>There Beth Coleman followed up on my talk:</strong><br /><br /></span><blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">Media professor Trebor Scholz gave a talk at MIT last week on Free Cooperation, discussing the ways in which we participate freely in data mining platforms (such as Google and Face Book) and what if means to give free labor to giant</span><span class="sizeGreater20"> commercial enterprises.</span><br /><br /><span class="sizeGreater20">He showed us network effect graphs that described the ways in which casual use of a site can turn into a de facto commitment to a platform. He also talked about how online labor exploitation is not visible in the manner that historical industrial labor has been. The centralizing effect of the giant media platforms is a phenomenon that causes him real alarm.</span><br /><br /><span class="sizeGreater20">I had a few more questions for him and he nicely agreed to continue the conversation here.</span><br /><br /><span class="sizeGreater20">1. Is this inevitable? Going from a mass-media distribution model to a distributed media of the Web, what has happened to the ability to choose? There are alternatives to Youtube?? Why does this site dominate? Is it design or social (the aggregating of people).</span><br /><br /><span class="sizeGreater20">2. There is no precedent for participatory networks at this scale. So the rules of ownership in regard to what one makes or even of one's personal information are not clear. The eula [end users agreement] for most sites say that the user give up all rights to content. If we are seeing a centralizing movement that reflects in effect our own use habits, how do we reverse this momentum?</span><br /><br /><span class="sizeGreater20">3. This free work is the opposite of what was meant by free software and open source initiatives a decade ago. Do user&rsquo;s rights need to be mandated at the level of law to prevent our herding instincts from helping to create de facto media monopoly? Does this destroy the progressive and innovative aspects of Web agency that someone like Y. Benkler has applauded in Wealth of Networks?</span><br /></blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20"><br /><strong>Trebor Scholz:<br /><br /></strong>Why do people congregate in very very large numbers in very few places? People want to be where other people are. I learn from my friends on Facebook (FB) through the newsfeed and from my network on Del.icio.us. Knowledge is created among us, laterally. D. Weinberger calls it the Daily We. I can see what my FB friends (people whom I met at conferences or with whom I am otherwise acquainted) bookmark, read, which events they put on, and which groups they associate themselves with. I'm certainly not alone-- these reasons motivate many of the 70 million people who are on Facebook.<br /><br />Business plans for startups are based on a very low threshold for participation, uploading is made very easy. People contribute videos, blog entries, wall posts, bookmarks, status updates, and photos but none of this material can be exported. An active user becomes more valuable over time, not unlike a bottle of wine in the wine cellar. All those &ldquo;friends&rdquo; with whom we reconnect, sometimes after quite some time, and all those media and texts are literally locked up. Try to delete Flickr photos (you&rsquo;ll have to go one by one; try that with the 2 GB that you just uploaded). Or, try deleting your Facebook (FB) account. You can't. Attempt to export blog entries on MySpace or photos on Facebook. Not accidentally, the export option does not exist. Groups are locked up in these social milieus. Weak-tie-communities are entrapped; it's a corporate confiscation of attention, creativity, and time. Steve Chen, co-founder of Youtube understands how much he owes the &quot;community&quot; when <a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCVxQ_3Ejkg">he thanks Youtube users</a> shortly after being acquired by Google for $1.6 billion. Chen: &ldquo;Thanks to everyone of you guys that have been contributing to YouTube, to the community. We would not be anywhere close to where we are without the help of this community.&rdquo; Within three years the site had achieved popularity and that user community directly translated into Google stocks. <br /> <br />Users who &quot;flirt&quot; with a given site are attracted by the wealth of user-submitted content. Bigger is better. It's the network effect: the more people use a technology, the more valuable it becomes. Fax machines don&rsquo;t get you very far if only 5 people use them. Equally, you'll not reconnect with your high school sweetheart on an obscure startup social networking site. You will also not find many photos with an uncommon tag on a photo site other than Flickr. User-submitted content makes these sites so attractive. The top ten site of the Web share 40% of all web traffic (sina.com, baidu.com, yahoo.com, msn.com, google.com, youtube.com, myspace.com, live.com, orkut.com, qq.com). These sites disproportionally control the networked public sphere because of the user-submitted content, which makes their social milieus so intensely engaging. Yochai Benkler refers to this mass-media-like constellation of media monopoly as the &quot;Berlusconi Effect.&quot; The democratizing effects that Benkler described in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7929105827">Wealth of Networks</a> in 1995 have little to do with user-generated content. He focuses on the remaining 60% web traffic made up in part of blogs that spread reports showing the shortcoming of Diebold's voting machines.<br /><br />I think that Benkler's sometimes criticized utopian enthusiasm for peer production is justified when it comes to initiatives like Wikipedia or even Google Adsense that allows individuals to supplement their income.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />&nbsp;Sure, there are endless alternatives to the MyTubes and YouSpaces of the World Wide Computer. But good luck trying to migrate your data and friend lists with you. YouTube is attractive because of those 70,000 uploads a day (and counting). It's very difficult to migrate data to another site. Interoperability is largely an illusion. Users can reconnect with high school friends and those dozens of people would not all move with the potential migrating users. The loss would be significant. My hope is that exportability will become a competitive advantage for Social Web companies. <br /><br />The American site Orkut dominates Brazil and India completely. Canada hearts Facebook. MySpace and FB reign supreme in the United States. How do these sites become the default? Some researchers suggest that it has to do with the colors of the interface or with a celebrity joining the site. (This is not so different to a real estate agency that spreads the news that the R&amp;B singer and songwriter Beyonc&eacute; will buy a duplex in a newly erected building.) But then, soon, once a solid number of users is established, the wealth of social life will be the attraction. Good design cannot have much to with it: just look at MySpace and its disastrous interface. <br /><br />Yochai Benkler correctly suggests that &quot;peer production is as efficient and significant for the 21 century as the assembly line was for the 20th century.&quot; I also agree with Benkler when he suggests that through peer production &quot;people can do more by and for themselves&quot; but I add that the pleasures of online sociality are exploited. Communities are often deceived and commodified. They are unfairly used as a resource, often without their consent and knowledge. It's a bit like Mark Twain's &quot;Whitewashing the Fence&quot; in Tom Sawyer.<br /><br /><span class="full-image-float-left"><img src="http://www.collectivate.net/storage/notes/sawyer.jpg" alt="sawyer.jpg" /></span>Tom tries to motivate the neighborhood boys to paint the fence for him. His friend Ben rejects the offer to paint the fence without pay. Tom responds &ldquo;What do you call work?&rdquo; and resumes his whitewashing:<br /><br />&ldquo;Well, maybe it is, and maybe it ain&rsquo;t. All I know, is, it suits Tom Sawyer.&rdquo;<br />&ldquo;Oh come, now, you don&rsquo;t mean to let on that you like it?&rdquo;<br /><br />The brush continued to move.<br /><br />&ldquo;Like it? Well, I don&rsquo;t see why I oughtn&rsquo;t to like it. Does a boy get a chance to whitewash a fence every day?&rdquo;<br /><br />That put the thing in a new light. Ben stopped nibbling his apple:<br /><br />&ldquo;Say, Tom, let me whitewash a little.&rdquo;<br /><br />Online the promise of the free service is subtler than Tom Sawyer's boyish box of manipulating tricks.<br />The surplus attention of people, diverted from television to the Internet, translates into many hours every day spent on social networking sites. (For Myspace that meant an increase in value from $ 583 million in 2005 to $15 billion in 2008.)<br /><br />I disagree with Benkler when he proposes social peace: &quot;The key is managing the marriage of money and nonmoney without making nonmoney feel like a sucker.&quot; How can big businesses like NewsCorp can get away with exploiting communities. From a business perspective, the question is how you a company can find people to make a living with. How can they harvest the labor and presence of those millions on Myspace, for example, without making them feel bad? This is also an underlying question for Don Tapscott in Wikinomics when he celebrates that &quot;In Second Life, the consumer actually co&ndash;innovates and coproduces the products they consume.&quot; (Tapscott and Williams, 2007. Wikinomics, p. 126). <br /><br />Companies like LindenLab, while granting users IP-rights to their creations in the virtual world SecondLife, make profits without providing anything but the technical backbone, the real estate for all this creativity and flying around. The ownership issues of submitted content are handled in favor of the user here. But perhaps that simply shows that the content does not matter so much. Since Howard Rheingold's <a href="http://www.electricminds.org/" target="_blank">Electric Minds</a>, companies have learned have learned that user-submitted content is very rarely what makes money. Today, the platform zars realize that it's about attention; it's about time spent in an environment and about the data that can be sucked out of the user clicks. &nbsp;<br /><br />Benkler, Lessig, Sunstein and others are looking at these issues as lawyers. Their contributions are important but they respond to questions that are relevant to the legal community. I approach the issues from the cultural activist perspective. &nbsp;<br /><br />Is centralization avoidable? Is it a new phenomenon? User-submitted or generated content such as book reviews are not new (very much in opposition to what Web 2.0 ideologues wants you to believe). Benkler argues for the Web as a place where ordinary people can find a voice but it is not a novel trend. Personal email was a sneaky and by all means unplanned use of ARPANET. Amazon.com's review submission feature started in 1995 as an early form of self-publishing. The Indian social networking site Sulekha kicked off in 1999.&nbsp; The participatory turn, the shock of the social, and groundswell of sociality online-- whatever you want to call this quantitative leap of participation in web-based social milieus-- it is new. &nbsp;<br /><br />Is the &quot;Berlusconi Effect&quot; avoidable on the Social Web? The history of radio would be a discouraging precedent. From a plethora of individual radio operators, airwave politics made sure that only the highest-paying stations would survive. Debates about net neutrality immediately enter my mind. A two-tiered Internet would be the kiss goodnight for decentralization. But <a href="http://tinyurl.com/4qvotm" target="_blank">recent news</a> made me hopeful.&nbsp;&nbsp; As it stands now, bloggers like Dailykoz or curated sites like Boingboing still exist and they are A-list sites in terms of traffic. They get a good share of the remaining 60% of traffic and that is worth defending. <br /><br /></span>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/29/our-book-is-finally-out.html"><rss:title>Our Book is Finally Out!!</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/29/our-book-is-finally-out.html</rss:link><dc:creator>[Trebor]</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-29T03:24:36Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3dfzwk" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.collectivate.net/storage/notes/Picture%201.png" alt="Picture%201.png" /></a></span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/28/good-practices-and-mobile-social-networking.html"><rss:title>Good Practices and Mobile Social Networking</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/28/good-practices-and-mobile-social-networking.html</rss:link><dc:creator>[Trebor]</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-28T06:05:30Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="width:425px;text-align:left" id="__ss_183565"><object style="margin:0px" width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=good-practices-on-the-mobile-social-web-1196229238555198-4"/><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=good-practices-on-the-mobile-social-web-1196229238555198-4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><div style="font-size:11px;font-family:tahoma,arial;height:26px;padding-top:2px;"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/?src=embed"><img src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/logo_embd.png" style="border:0px none;margin-bottom:-5px" alt="SlideShare"/></a> | <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/trebor/good-practices-on-the-mobile-social-web" title="View 'Good Practices on the Mobile Social Web' on SlideShare">View</a> | <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/upload">Upload your own</a></div></div><br><br>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/14/web-20-ethics.html"><rss:title>Web 2.0 Ethics</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/14/web-20-ethics.html</rss:link><dc:creator>[Trebor]</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-14T12:52:18Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="width:425px;text-align:left" id="__ss_166082"><object style="margin:0px" width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=web-20-ethics-1195045165129727-3"/><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=web-20-ethics-1195045165129727-3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><div style="font-size:11px;font-family:tahoma,arial;height:26px;padding-top:2px;"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/?src=embed"><img src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/logo_embd.png" style="border:0px none;margin-bottom:-5px" alt="SlideShare"/></a> | <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/trebor/web-20-ethics" title="View 'Web 2.0 Ethics' on SlideShare">View</a> | <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/upload">Upload your own</a></div></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/8/motivations-for-participation.html"><rss:title>Motivations for Participation</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/11/8/motivations-for-participation.html</rss:link><dc:creator>[Trebor]</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-08T04:14:57Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="width:425px;text-align:left" id="__ss_159181"><object style="margin:0px" width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=motivating-people-to-participate-1194495008761736-1"/><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=motivating-people-to-participate-1194495008761736-1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><div style="font-size:11px;font-family:tahoma,arial;height:26px;padding-top:2px;"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/?src=embed"><img src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/logo_embd.png" style="border:0px none;margin-bottom:-5px" alt="SlideShare"/></a> | <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/trebor/motivating-people-to-participate" title="View 'Motivating People to Participate' on SlideShare">View</a> | <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/upload">Upload your own</a></div></div>

<br><br>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/10/3/the-web-20-ideology.html"><rss:title>The Web 2.0 Ideology</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/10/3/the-web-20-ideology.html</rss:link><dc:creator>[Trebor]</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-10-03T23:55:36Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="sizeGreater20">Web 2.0 is not just a viral term used to describe the broad set of techno-social changes on the Web; it is also a general way of looking at things, an ideology. This ideology is a set of ideas that was proposed by the founder of a large technology publishing house, Tim O&rsquo;Reilly, in 2004. While some of his propositions are accurate, others, which are suggested (but largely remain untold) have to be discredited. This essay will first trace back the term, situate it, and then make the ahistoricity of this branding effort transparent. <br /><br /><strong>The Power of Naming</strong><br />Public discourse is controlled by those who manage to manipulate the language of the debate. In 2006, &quot;Web 2.0&quot; was the Wikipedia article with the highest number of incoming, external links. The Web 2.0 Ideology is a marketing tool that falsely reframes the steady evolution of the Web as a sudden explosion, a big bang of techno-social components that were then collected under the conceptual umbrella of the newly created brand. While the Web 2.0 concept was initially criticized, the market logic that it proposes as common-sensensical, remains largely unchallenged. Entrepreneurs welcome the term, amateurs thought that they were learning something, pragmatists surrendered, while a few others are looking for less ideologically charged language. O'Reilly's branding idea, associated with radical novelty, sells books and tickets to events but most importantly, it has the potential to excite venture capitalists, not completely unlike the years of the dot-com mania. <br /><br /><strong>Web 2.0</strong><br />The ideas associated with the Web 2.0 brand were often discussed. In October 2004, the term was coined by Tim O&rsquo;Reilly and his colleague John Battelle. Both men brainstormed the topical focus of an upcoming conference about the Web, came up with the term and trademarked it. Two years later, at a UC Berkeley commencement speech, Tim O'Reilly said:<br /></span></p><blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;If history is any guide, the democratization promised by Web 2.0 will eventually be succeeded by new monopolies, just as the democratization promised by the personal computer led to an industry dominated by only a few companies. Those companies will have enormous power over our lives -- and may use it for good or ill.&quot; </span><br /></blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">Ten days after making this self-effacing statement, the publishing tzar sent a &quot;Cease or Desist&quot; order to a small Irish not-for-profit organization that had planned a half-day symposium with the W-word in its title.<br /><br />Initially, people were mystified about the exact meaning of the concept and O'Reilly's blog essay What is Web 2.0? was supposed to address that problem. In this text, he proposes a versioning of the Web and suggests that we currently experience is version number two. The first (think: old) version of Web is characterized by listing a set of static browser-based applications and components including Ofoto, Brittanica Online, personal websites, sites like evite, broadcast-type publishing, content management systems, and taxonomies.<br /><br />Subsequently, he distinguishes Web 2.0 by associating it with folksonomies (user-generated taxonomies), blogging, wikis, and syndication and more specifically, sites like Flickr, BitTorrent, Napster, Wikipedia, Upcoming.org and Google AdSense. Techniques and technologies include AJAX, API, XML, and RSS. <br /><br />Illustrations of Web 2.0 commonly map an overwhelmingly large number of logos of startups, supposedly demonstrating that the creators have their thumbs right on the pulse of the Internet. These maps are meant to visualize the momentum of this phenomenon, while making the non-familiar user feel intimidated. <br /><br /><strong>How new is it really?</strong><br />Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the Web, questioned whether one can use the term in any meaningful way, since many of the technologies that make up Web 2.0 have existed since the early days of the Web.<br /><br />The Web, for example, has always been social. Its first incarnation, ARPANET, was rapidly taken over by email exchanges. Blogging, another supposed argument for the novelty of Web 2.0 was some ten years old at the moment of the conception of Web 2.0. Already in 1994, the eccentric Swarthmore student Justin Hall pioneered blogging by using the Web to reveal details of his self-exploration and sexual adventures. In addition, user-generated content did not just suddenly appear in 2004. Forms of self-publishing are as old as Amazon.com, which allowed users to write reviews and consumer guides since its launch in 1995. An additional, often repeated feature of Web 2.0 is that now users have a voice. David Weinberger reminds us that, &ldquo;<em>NO, back from the very beginning what drove people onto the net was not so that people can shop ... Weblogs and all that have made it way, way easier but the Web has always been about voice and conversation.</em>&quot;<br /><br />It is true that a wide spread democratization of news and information is taking place but at the same time, it is corporate social milieus that facilitate most of large-scale sociality. Yochai Benkler writes:<br /></span><blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;At a more foundational level of collective understanding, the shift from an industrial to a networked information economy increases the extent to which individuals can become active participants in producing their own cultural environment. It opens the possibility of a more critical and reflective culture (130).&quot;</span><br /></blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">On the one hand, Benkler is correct to suggest that online cultures are more participatory but his statement ignores the corporate context to almost all places in which major sociality takes place online. These platforms are not owned by users but they are, conversely, the possession of businesses with the goal of profit. Yochai Benkler also suggests a newly gained autonomy for the individual:<br /></span><blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;The networked information economy makes individuals better able to do things for and by themselves, and makes them less susceptible to manipulation by others than they were in the mass-media culture. In this sense, the emergence of this new set of technical, economic, social, and institutional relations can increase the relative role that each individual is able to play in authoring his or her own life (130).&quot;</span><br /></blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">The suggestion that there is less manipulation today is partially true but </span><span class="sizeGreater20">simultaneously</span><span class="sizeGreater20"> it has serious shortcomings. Software architectures of &quot;<em>social software giants</em>&quot; like Yahoo, Google, or NewsCorp are manipulative in their own, perhaps novel ways. NewsCorp, the corporation that also runs FoxNews, deceives MySpace users, with its lack of transparency when it comes to ownership of content and privacy. Also consider the planned introduction of &quot;news feeds&quot; on MySpace. <br /><br />Apart from the undifferentiated claim of democratization there is also the Network Effect on the list of components of Web 2.0. The telephone and later also the fax are only two historical examples of this effect that alludes to the fact that use value of these technologies is increasingly drastically, the more people are using it. The more people own a fax machine, the more sense it makes for the individual to buy this product. In addition, social networking sites (sns) are also hardly new. The first social networking sites, Classmates and Match.com, were founded in 1995.<br /><br />Yet another crucial aspect of the Web 2.0 concept is the separation of content and presentation, which is equally old news. Style sheets, for example, have existed since the 1970s. Traditionally, html coding merged content with form. The introduction of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) and XML, however, changed that. </span><span class="sizeGreater20">Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) were developed as a means for creating a consistent approach to providing style information for web documents. The CSS Working Group published CSS as a W3C Recommendation in 1998.</span><p>&nbsp;<br /><span class="sizeGreater20">Talk of novelty is equally misplaced when it come to wikis. Ward Cunningham installed WikiWikiWeb on the Internet in 1995. And the first version of RSS, a format for syndicating content, was created by Netscape in 1999. </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><br /><br />Application Programming Interface (API) is an additional technology at the core of Web 2.0. APIs&nbsp; interconnect websites just like a door way through which people with the right &ldquo;key&rdquo; can pass; they facilitate the link between one computer program and another. Open APIs allow programmers to write applications that access the rich databases at Google, Facebook or Yahoo.&nbsp; In the past, companies protected their APIs like treasures. But more recently, they decided to share their APIs, allowing developers to build their own hybrid mash-up software. Frappr, for example, uses GoogleMaps and adds layers of conversations on top of them. <br /><br />Hardly the latest marker of the evolution of the Web, Extensible Markup Language (XML) facilitates the sharing of data across different systems on the Internet. XML 1.0 became a &ldquo;W3C Recommendation&rdquo; already in 1998. <br /><br />Folksonomy, however, was popularized in 2004. It stands for collaborative tagging, social classification, social indexing, social tagging. It is the practice and method of collaboratively creating and managing tags to annotate and categorize content. While the Web has always been social, the scale of participation is new. It did not, however, explode over night but was the result of the steady growth of the Web. Today, online participation is made easier because of increased familiarity, easier-to-use tools and broader access to bandwidth and technologies.<br /><br />Also new is the term AJAX, first coined by Jesse J. Garrett in 2005. It means that Javascript is now working in a way that allows web-based applications to function much like traditional desktop software. AJAX makes web pages feel more responsive by exchanging only small amounts of data with the server so that one does not have to reload the entire web page, each time when requesting a change. While the term AJAX is new, it uses a set of decade-old, existing technologies.<br /><br />While neither user-generated content, XML, RSS, wikis, blogs, CSS, the network effect, or social networking sites were new in 2004, it is correct that folksonomies as well as the current scale of participation are indeed new. <br /><br /><strong>The Web 2.0 Ideology</strong><br />Web 2.0 ideologues say that control is bad but in fact control is only increasing as Lawrence Lessig warns us in his book Code 2.0. Other abreviations of this rethoric include: openness--good, authority--bad, hierarchy--bad, and amateur creativity--good. <br /><br />With Web 2.0, services, rather than products are offered and users are encouraged to participate. Architectures of participation allow networked publics to achieve what Pierre Levy called Collective Intelligence. Networked individuals refer each other to useful content. They page rank, tag, follow and &quot;unfollow.&quot; The line between amateur and professional gets blurred when users collaborate to write blogs and wiki entries. Users tag content online and therefore in many cases editorial classification is made unnecessary.<br /><br />The claim of the relinquishing of control, an essential part of the Web 2.0 ideology, is a myth as William Blaze argues:<br /></span></p><blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &quot;What separates the Web 2.0 from that plain old &quot;web&quot; is the establishment and entrenchment of a hierarchy of power and control. This is not the same control that Microsoft, AOL and other closed system/walled garden companies tried unsuccessfully to push upon internet users. Power in the Web 2.0 age comes not from controlling the whole system, but in controlling the connections in a larger network of systems. It is the power of those who create not open systems, but semi-open systems, the power of API writers, network builders and standard definers.&quot;</span><br /></blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">Many tasks can now be &quot;out-sourced&quot; to the users who can create in &quot;self-service&quot; mode. The business world introduced the term &quot;crowdsourcing&quot; for an entrepreneurial model &quot;i<em>n which a company or institution takes a job traditionally performed by a designated agent (usually an employee) and outsources it to an undefined, generally large group of people in the form of an open call over the Internet. The work is compensated with little or no pay in most cases,</em>&quot; as Wikipedia puts it.<br /><br />The Web 2.0 ideology describes the user experience as &quot;free,&quot; convenient, rich, and pleasurable, which makes it easy for users to forget that their &quot;life labor&quot; creates monetary value. Services lure users with the promise of a free service, which is by no means free when one observes the surplus created inthese environments. Web 2.0 makes people easier to use; companies like Amazon and Ebay aimed to make use of their users from the very beginning. A detailed analysis of the dynamics of labor is not the topic of this essay. <br /><br />Users can re-use and remix existing content. Web 2.0 ideologist Don Tapscott in his book &quot;Wikinomics&quot; talks a lot about relinquishing control and about openness, trust and authenticity. Wikipedia goes largely along when it defines Web 2.0 as &quot;<em>a social phenomenon referring to an approach to creating and distributing Web content itself, characterized by open communication, decentralization of authority, freedom to share and re-use.</em>&quot; But while the Web 2.0 ideology claims openness and the end of walled gardens, the reality looks radically different. &nbsp;<br /><br />The versioning of the Web, this false assertion of novelty, has become a placeholder for the 2.0 ideology that has caught on in many areas that do not have an obvious linkage to the Internet. Below, see in brackets the Google search results for the mentioned terms (July 11, 2007). Beyond Love 2.0 (48 700), there are many other examples:<br /><br />Copyright 2.0 (94 900)<br />Networked publics share content through Creative Commons Licenses.<br /><br />Business 2.0 (1 930 000)<br />Users/Creators are meant to blur seamlessly into businesses.<br /><br />Identity 2.0 (330 000)<br />Our identity and knowledge is now shaped socially, it is in between us, in&nbsp; the small circle of our friends. <br /><br />Author 2.0 (76 600)<br />Large-scale literary experiments are now possible, allowing very many people to jointly write a novel, for example. <br /><br />Science 2.0 (349 000)<br />Distributed citizen science has many examples today. Cornell University's extensive bird watching site collects data from citizens on a scale that has not been possible before. &nbsp;<br /><br />Travel 2.0 ( 247 000)<br />Users jointly create travel guides.<br /><br />&nbsp;Law 2.0 (39 700)<br />The government of New-Zealand put their penal law online, for citizens to edit. <br /><br />To sum up, the Web 2.0 ideology is characterized by the ahistorical promise of radical novelty, openness, increased democracy, worship of the creative amateur, the power of the many (&quot;collective intelligence&quot; and &quot;crowd sourcing&quot;), the promise of a &quot;free service,&quot; the claim of the end of hierarchies, the relinquishing of (corporate) control, the separation of form and content and therefore the possibility of the mobility of data, the switch from desktop applications to web apps, the web as platform, a new scale of participation, and a significantly more convenient and rich user experience. <br /><br />What sounds like 1960's counter culture rebellion, against control and authority, is far from it. It is hard not to think of Richard Barbrook's Californian Ideology, the &quot;<em>bizarre fusion of the cultural bohemianism of San Francisco with the hi-tech industries of Silicon Valley.&quot;</em> Web 2.0 ideologues use the language of rebellion, anarchy and horizontal structures but their core values do not support the goal of the Internet as a common good.<br /> <br /></span><p>&nbsp;</p><br><br>


<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://s3.amazonaws.com/slideshare/ssplayer.swf?id=125086&doc=the-web-20-ideology2257" width="425" height="348"><param name="movie" value="http://s3.amazonaws.com/slideshare/ssplayer.swf?id=125086&doc=the-web-20-ideology2257" /></object><br><br>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/9/26/a-history-of-the-social-web.html"><rss:title>A History of the Social Web</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/9/26/a-history-of-the-social-web.html</rss:link><dc:creator>[Trebor]</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-09-26T18:28:31Z</dc:date><dc:subject>collaboration politics creative commons cultural context providers Social Web Ciitizen_journalism Participation Blogging social networking social media tagging wikipedia social software folksonomy ethics fandom commons identity network culture art activism web 2.0 academic history</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="sizeGreater20"><em><font color="blue" style="color: blue;">This is a draft of a chapter and not a finished essay. Citations will be added. The slides of two presentations about this material are available: <a target="_blank" href="http://tinyurl.com/2awpmj">part 1</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://tinyurl.com/2bhezx">part 2</a>. You can also download a .pdf of a <a href="http://molodiez.org/soc_web_his_TreborScholz.pdf">linear time line </a>(zoom in).</font></em></span><span class="sizeGreater20"><font color="blue" style="color: blue;"><br /> </font></span><span class="sizeGreater20"><em><font color="blue" style="color: blue;"><em><br /> Please send corrections or comments to trebor@thing.net </em></font></em></span><span class="sizeGreater20"><em><font color="blue" style="color: blue;"><em>(updated last:&nbsp; October 23, 2007)<br /> </em></font></em></span><span class="sizeGreater20"><em><br />     </em></span></p>        <span class="sizeGreater20">  This is a cross-cultural, critical history of social life on the Internet. It captures technical, cultural, and political events that influenced the evolution of computer-assisted person-to-person communication via the net. In difference to other historical accounts, this essay acknowledges the role of grassroots movements and does not solely focus on mainstream culture with all its mergers, acquisitions, sales and markets, and the (mostly male) geeks, engineers, scientists, and garage entrepreneurs who implemented their dreams in hardware and software. This is a critical history as it </span><span class="sizeGreater20">traces the changing nature of labor and typologies of those who create value online as much as it searches for changing approaches toward control, privacy, and intellectual property. It shows strategies for direct social change based on the technologies and practices which already exist.</span><br />     <span class="sizeGreater20">  </span><br />     <span class="sizeGreater20">Emphasizing the role of women whenever possible, this history shows that the interests of those who used the Net as social platform shaped it in the</span><span class="sizeGreater20"> interplay of military, scientific, entrepreneurial, activist, artistic, and altruistic agendas. The evolution of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Web" target="_blank">Social Web</a> was driven by fear, desire (to be with others), and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fandom" target="_blank">fandom</a>. </span><span class="sizeGreater20">By no means exclusively an American story, </span><span class="sizeGreater20">it shows instances in which users succeeded when striving for open access, jointly negotiating with corporate platform-providers.<br />  </span><br /> <p><span class="sizeGreater20">      Networked sociality did, of course, not start with the Internet. Tom Standage in &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.tomstandage.com/vicnet.html">The Victorian Internet</a>&quot; compares the history of the telegraph to that of the net by talking about geographically distributed telegraph operators who were dating each other after hours. With a telegraph cable connecting the United States and Europe, communication across the Atlantic was easy, people believed in the end of all wars. Standage describes the information overload and widespread euphoria that were associated with the Internet, already occurring with the implementation of the telegraph. <br /> Neither the telegraph nor the telephone were the only means of networked communication leading up to </span><span class="sizeGreater20">computer-assisted person-to-person communication via the net</span><span class="sizeGreater20"> but this pre-history is extensively covered in the literature on the history of communication. </span><br /> <span class="sizeGreater20">      <br /> </span><span class="sizeGreater20">This essay now &quot;fastforwards&quot; through history, tracing main ideas that were crucial in the evolution of networked sociality online. </span><span class="sizeGreater20">Famously, in 1945 the American computing pioneer <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vannevar_Bush">Vannevar Bush</a> outlined the idea of hyperlinked pages and the &ldquo;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memex" target="_blank">Memex</a>,&rdquo; (knowledge on call), which were fundamental for the World Wide Web. Bush conceived of the &quot;Memex&quot; as &quot;<em>an enlarged intimate supplement to [man's] memory.</em>&quot; Four years later, in his novel <a href="http://www.amazon.com/H%C3%A9liopolis-Ernst-J%C3%BCnger/dp/2253047562/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-9385801-7628719?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190964327&sr=8-1" target="_blank">Heliopolis</a>, the German author <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_J%C3%BCnger" target="_blank">Ernst </a></span><span class="sizeGreater20"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_J%C3%BCnger" target="_blank">J&uuml;nger</a></span><span class="sizeGreater20"> dreams up the communication medium <strong>&quot;</strong>Phonophor,&quot; which he describes as connecting everybody to everybody else, enabling a permanent, technically facilitated forum that also replaces the newspaper, library, and encyclopedia. <br /> <br />       Such anticipation of interaction and participatory cultures were also present in the arts. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Cage" target="_blank">John Cage'</a>s three-movement piece 4'33&quot; premiered in 1952, given by <a target="_blank" href="http://www.emf.org/tudor/">David Tudor</a> at Woodstock in upstate New York. This widely known and often cited piece, performed for four minutes and thirty three seconds was related to Cage's experience at Harvard University's isolation chamber where he was able to listen to the sound of the blood in his body circulating. It is widely known that Cage considered the quotidian sounds, the sounds that surround us, as music. The audience in performances of <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4%E2%80%B233%E2%80%B3">4'33&quot;</a> is activated and unintentionally becomes part of the piece in so far as the noises that they themselves are making become part of the work. In 1957 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Kaprow" target="_blank">Allan Kaprow</a> first coined the term &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happening">happening</a>&quot; and referred to it as a performance, event or situation. Happenings were meant to be art, often lacked a narrative, could take place anywhere and sought to involve the audience. Wikipedia cites Kaprow&rsquo;s piece 18 Happenings in 6 Parts as the first happening. According to the art historian Claire Bishop<br />       </span></p> <p>           </p> <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&quot;[A]ctivation; authorship; community -- are the most frequently cited motivations for almost all artistic attempts to encourage participation in art since the 1960s.&quot; </span><em><br />       </em></blockquote>       <span class="sizeGreater20">      Also in 1957 an event took place that sent shock waves through the United States administration and its effect on the American psyche can be compared to Pearl Harbor, Hiroshima, or the attacks of September 11, 2001. On October 4th, the USSR launched <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputnik">Sputnik</a> (</span><span class="sizeGreater20">a 180-pound aluminum ball</span><span class="sizeGreater20">) </span><span class="sizeGreater20">the world's first artificial satellite</span><span class="sizeGreater20">. The US American public feared annihilation through a military strike from a Soviet satellite and the government promptly set up the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA">DARPA</a>) at the Pentagon.<br />       <br />       At DARPA, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.C.R._Licklider" target="_blank">J.C.R. Licklider</a>, called &quot;Lick&quot; by his colleagues, provided the vision for networking that would lead to the development of ARPANET, the forerunner of the modern Internet. In his essay <a target="_blank" href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0353.html?">The Computer as Communication Device</a>, Licklider anticipated real-time interactivity: <br />       </span>       <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&quot;We believe that we are entering into a technological age, in which we will be able to interact with the richness of living information -- not merely in the passive way that we have become accustomed to using books and libraries, but as&nbsp; active participants in an ongoing process, bringing something to it through our interaction with it, and not simply receiving something from it by our connection to it.&quot;</span><em><br />       </em></blockquote>       <span class="sizeGreater20">The concept of the hyperlink, originated by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vannevar_Bush" target="_blank">Vannevar Bush</a>, was technically implemented in 1960 by visionary <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nelson" target="_blank">Ted Nelson</a> who proposed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Xanadu" target="_blank">Xanadu</a>, a global network and a place for literary memory. Occupied with the need for a communication system that could withstand a projected large-scale (possibly nuclear) attack by the Soviet Union, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Baran" target="_blank">Paul Baran</a>, proposed a distributed network in his essay &ldquo;On Distributed Communication Networks&rdquo; (1964). In this document Baran demonstrated that sections of a distributed network could be destroyed while the message would still reach its destination. His &quot;distributed network&quot; and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Kleinrock" target="_blank">Leonard Kleinrock</a>'s essay on </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packet_switching">packet switching</a></span><span class="sizeGreater20"> (1960), were key stepping stones on the way to the invention of the Internet. In 1962, Baran describes </span><span class="sizeGreater20">packet switching</span><span class="sizeGreater20">:<em> &quot;all the nodes in the network would be equal in status to all other nodes, each node with its own authority to originate, pass, and receive messages.&quot;</em> The messages themselves would be divided into packets, each packet separately addressed. If there is a traffic jam at one point in the network, it can be re-routed. The mathematician Kleinrock pointed out (somewhat jokingly) that he can guarantee that an email message, for example, would reach its destination but he cannot promise that it will be read. While the distributed network called for an expensive hardware </span><span class="sizeGreater20">system </span><span class="sizeGreater20">infrastructure, it was the way to go.&nbsp; <br />       <br />       In the early 1960's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLATO" target="_blank">PLATO</a>, a crucial system in the development of pre-Internet networked communication was developed at the University of Illinois at Urbana. More than ten years later, Doug Brown wrote a software program called Talkomatic, which supported chat among PLATO users. <br />       <br />       <strong>Email, Standardization, and Protocols</strong><br />       In 1965, </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernando_J._Corbat%C3%B3" target="_blank"><span class="sizeGreater20">Fernando Jos&eacute; Corbató</span></a><span class="sizeGreater20"> and his colleagues at MIT developed a program to allowed individual users to swap messages on one single computer. This was the first email but it was not sent via the Internet. In 1968, ARPA asked for a quotation to build a network of four Interface Message Processors. Instead of the major communication companies like IBM or AT&amp;T, it was the brave people at the Boston-based company <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBN_Technologies" target="_blank">BBN</a> who lived up to the challenge in nine months. <br />       <br />  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vint_Cerf" target="_blank">     Vint Cerf </a>(today </span><span class="sizeGreater20">Vice President </span><span class="sizeGreater20"> of Google) and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Kahn" target="_blank">Bob Kahn</a>, one of the BBN researchers, wrote and helped establish <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol">TCP/IP</a> as the protocol on which the Internet runs in 1968. The campaigns related to the establishment of protocols that run on the Internet were intense. The US government, for example, preferred another protocol but TCP/IP was non-proprietary and public domain and thus spread anarchically like a wild fire across small networks and in the end it would have been to expensive to switch to another standard. <br />       <br />       TCP, or &quot;Transmission Control Protocol,&quot; converts messages into streams of packets at the source and then reassembles them back into messages at the destination while IP, or &quot;Internet Protocol,&quot; handles the addressing, seeing to it that packets are routed across multiple nodes and even across multiple networks with multiple standards. The establishment of an overarching standard for the Internet was crucial. The Net would have been defunct if machines would have attempted to communicate with each other in different languages. It is similar to a fax machine that obviously cannot communicate with another location if the person there does not own a fax machine herself. In 1993, the science fiction author <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_sterling" target="_blank">Bruce Sterling</a> talked about the Internet's &quot;anarchy&quot; saying that <em>&ldquo;It's rather like the 'anarchy' of the English language. Nobody rents English, and nobody owns English. As an English-speaking person, it's up to you to learn how to speak English properly and make whatever use you please of it...&rdquo;</em> TCP/IP offered such a common standard (not unlike the English language) that would allow different networks to connect and form one big network: the Inter-net. <br />       <br />       <strong>Tools to the People-- The Birth of the Net</strong><br />       In 1969 ARPA commissions research into networking and the first node of ARPANET went live at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), which was one of the networks that led to today's Internet. At a time when hippies dominated the campus, the first machine arrived at UCLA in a military, fridge-sized container, moveable by helicopter. This first Los Angeles node was then connected to UC Santa Barbara, Stanford University and then the University of Utah. Many universities were apparently not too exited about the ability of sharing material. (&quot;<em>They had their own fish to fry.</em>&quot;) This event of connecting these four nodes is commonly credited as the birth of today's Internet.</span><span class="sizeGreater20"> Kleinrock was so moved by this moment that he wrote a poem about it.<br />       </span>  <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&quot;We cautiously connected and the bits began to flow. The pieces really functioned just why I still don't know.&nbsp; Messages are moving pretty well by Wednesday morn. All the rest is history, packet switching had been born.&quot;</span><br />  </blockquote>  <span class="sizeGreater20">     </span><span class="sizeGreater20"> In the meantime there had been attempts to create networks similar to ARPANET, for example the <a href="http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/chris/think/Cyclades/" target="_blank">Cyclades</a> project in France, but none of succeeded in the long run. <br /> </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><br />       In 1969, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_Earth_Catalog" target="_blank">Whole Earth Catalog </a>was first published by a group of founders, most notably </span><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Brand"><span class="sizeGreater20">Stewart Brand</span></a><span class="sizeGreater20">, with the idea of bringing tools to people to build a better society, which was seen as an alternative to joining the crusade to help a big cause; a strategy, which </span><span class="sizeGreater20"> had failed </span><span class="sizeGreater20">according to </span><span class="sizeGreater20">one of the Whole Earth Catalog editors, </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Rheingold" target="_blank">Howard Rheingold</a></span><span class="sizeGreater20">.&nbsp; <br />       <br />       <strong>The First Wireless Network</strong><br /> <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Abramson">      Norm Abramson</a>, a passionate surfer and professor at the University of Hawaii, was keen to know what the waves were like on the other islands. Therefore he developed a radio network that would allow for communication, using a protocol telling the computers how to share the airwaves. Launched in 1970, using radio waves rather than telephone lines to network computers, </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALOHAnet" target="_blank">     ALOHANET</a></span><span class="sizeGreater20"> was the first wireless network involving computers. </span><span class="sizeGreater20">ALOHANET and many other small networks were later linked up to ARPANET.&nbsp; <br /> </span><span class="sizeGreater20">Such wireless networks are an inexpensive and fast way to connect to the Internet in countries and geographic regions with a poor communication infrastructure (e.g., most of the economic developing world). <br />       <br />       In 1971, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Tomlinson" target="_blank">Ray Tomlinson</a> (b. 1941) also at BBN, wrote a piece of software that allowed messages to be sent between computers and one year later he sent the first email via the Internet. To separate the user from his or her machine in the email address he introduced the <strong>@</strong> sign. While <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_F._B._Morse" target="_blank">Samuel Morse</a>' first telegraph message read <em>&ldquo;What Hath God Wrought,&rdquo;</em> Ray Tomlinson's first email said something like <em>&quot;QWERTYIOP.&quot;</em> <br />       &nbsp;<br />       In the same year <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_S._Hart" target="_blank">Michael Hart</a> founded <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Gutenberg">Project Gutenberg (PG)</a>, the <em>&quot;oldest digital library built on volunteer efforts to digitize, archive, and distribute cultural works.&quot;</em> The project is the largest single collection of free electronic books, or eBooks, online. Projects like this show that already the beginnings of the Internet were marked by military and academic research agendas as well as personal conversations via email and altruistic initiatives like Hart's Project Gutenberg.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />       <br />       By 1975 most of what happened on ARPANET was email, which was really not in sync with ARPANET's explicit research focus but it demonstrated the desire of people, given the opportunity, to be social, to talk to each other. <br />       <br />       <strong>Mailing Lists!</strong><br />       Two years later, the first mailing list, called MsgGroup, was created for ARPANET. <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethan_Zuckerman">Ethan Zuckerman</a> reports that the second email on that list was an apology by the system's administrator for doing such a lousy job in keeping up with everybody's requests. <br /> <br /> In 1979 Kevin MacKenzie e-mailed his fellow subscribers at MsgGroup, with a suggestion to put some emotion back into the dry text medium of e-mail. He proposed &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoticon">emoticons</a>&quot; starting with <strong>-)</strong> MacKenzie's proposal caused widespread outrage but emoticons caught on. The eyes were added years later by a professor at Carnegie Mellon University<strong> :--)</strong><br />       <br />       In 1977, the term 'groupware' was coined and while the Internet was still mainly a research network, <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Bartle">Richard Bartle</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Trubshaw">Roy Trubshaw</a> created the first MUD (<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-User_Dungeon">Multi-User Dungeon</a>), later leading to <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMORPG">MMORPG</a>s (e.g., Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games like World of Warcraft). MUDs are</span> <span class="sizeGreater20"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplayer_game" title="Multiplayer game">multi-player computer game</a> that combine features of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-playing_games" title="Role-playing games">role-playing games</a> with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chat_room" title="Chat room">chat rooms</a></span><span class="sizeGreater20">.<br />       <br />       January 1978 is legendary for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.super70s.com/Super70s/Tech/Nature/Disasters/Blizzards/79-Chicago.asp">Chicago's Great Blizzard</a> that buried the city under snow for weeks. Stuck in his house, it was then and there that <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_Christensen">Ward Christensen</a> wrote the first <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBS">BBS</a>, called CBBS. At that time, many people did not have access to the Internet. Instead, they dialed in to CBBS directly via a modem.&nbsp;</span> <span class="sizeGreater20"><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletin_board_system">According to Wikipedia</a>, a &quot;<em>BBS is a computer system running software that allows users to dial into the system over a phone line (or Telnet) and, using a terminal program, perform functions such as downloading software and data, uploading data, reading news, and exchanging messages with other users.</em>&quot;</span><span class="sizeGreater20"> Users had to take turns accessing the system, each hanging up when done to let someone else have access. Nevertheless, the system was seen as very useful and ran for many years. It also inspired the creation of many other bulletin board systems and soon, the first <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_art">ASCii art</a> appeared on BBSs and also porn could be purchased on BBS's like </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rusty_n_Edie%27s_BBS" title="Rusty n Edie's BBS">Rusty n Edie's</a></span><span class="sizeGreater20">. In the early 1980s The <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FidoNet">Fido Network</a> of Bulletin Board Systems started up, which allowed users to post to a network of linked up BBS's. Messages were sent from one BBS to the next once a day. <br />       <br />       For the Internet to become popular it still needed <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Engelbart">Douglas Engelbart</a> to invent the computer mouse and there needed to be PCs in people's homes. Without that, the Internet would have remained a network solely connecting supercomputers at big research centers. It also needed a common standard that would allow the many small networks to talk to each other. If you call up somebody in Brazil and you have a perfect connection, it is still useless unless you speak Portuguese (or the person on the other end speaks English). <br />       <br />       In 1978, two Duke University graduates and one student from the University of North Carolina created <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet">USENET </a>newsgroups, a system that copies files between computers without central control. These message sharing systems that exchanged emails electronically around the world were the precursors of peer-to-peer applications like <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnutella">Gnutella</a> or discussion boards such as <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Groups">GoogleGroups</a>. Early&nbsp; mailing lists and newsgroups, often organized by topic, constituted first <a target="_blank" href="http://networkedpublics.org/taxonomy/term/22/9"><em>networked publics</em>.</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;  <br />       <br />       In 1980 the L'Organisation europ&eacute;enne pour la recherche nucl&eacute;aire (<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERN">CERN</a>) in Geneva, Switzerland, hired the independent British researcher and programmer Tim Berners-Lee on a six-month contract. All three references that Berners-Lee provided to CERN, described him as <em>&quot;intense, efficient, and creative.&quot;</em> <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Berners-Lee">Tim Berners-Lee</a> proposed a project based on the concept of hypertext that would facilitate the sharing and updating of information among researchers. In many ways, CERN was an unlikely host for such a project. It was a place where scientists were known to do incomprehensible things with tiny bits of matter, with labs specializing in the most esoteric form of research imaginable. There was no corporate research agenda but the philosophy of CERN was research out of pure curiosity, which according to CERN, led to all great inventions throughout human history.<br />       <br />       <strong>Establishing User Expectations </strong><br />       In 1981 the first IBM personal computer shipped with a computer mouse. Throughout the 1980s PCs entered the homes in the United States and computer manufacturers pushed proprietary protocols but this ill-advised effort failed quickly. In the same year BITNET was released as a collaboration between Ira Fuchs at the City University of New York and Greydon Freeman at Yale University. BITNET's main features were email and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LISTSERV">listserv</a> but most importantly <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BITNET">BITNET</a> set expectations for free access and openness. BITNET, which initially stood for <em>&quot;Because It's There&quot;</em> and later for <em>&quot;Because It's Time,&quot;</em> charged by bandwidth, which meant that once you paid for a line, how much you use it was up to you. Others tried to establish a pay by byte system. <br />       <br />       In 1983 the American National Science Foundation (NSF) constructed a university network backbone. A year later, the term <em>Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW) </em>was established in the context of a workshop and out of it was a spirit of collaboration that led <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Brand">Stewart Brand</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Brilliant">Larry Brilliant </a>to found The Well, one of the first community bulletin boards in </span><span class="sizeGreater20">1985</span><span class="sizeGreater20">. <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WELL">The Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link</a> <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WELL">(The Well)</a> is one of the oldest virtual communities in continuous operation. To postto The Well, Brand used a networked PC on his houseboat in Sasalito (CA), claiming that he founded The Well in order to experience communal living without actually having to move into a community. Well members started many discussion boards but the most popular one was dedicated to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grateful_Dead" target="_blank">The Grateful Dead</a>. Some &quot;dead heads&quot; bought computers just to be on The Well. In his book &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/s/104-9385801-7628719?ie=UTF8&tag=mozilla-20&index=blended&link%5Fcode=qs&field-keywords=Virtual%20Community.%20Homesteading&sourceid=Mozilla-search">Virtual Community. Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier</a>&quot; (1993) Howard Rheingold uses The Well as a prime example of a &quot;virtual community'' where people meet, collaborate, argue, and support each other emotionally. <br />       <br />       <strong>Experiments in Collaboration and the </strong></span><span class="sizeGreater20"><strong>Monetization of Virtual Communities</strong></span><span class="sizeGreater20"><br />       In 1984 the French philosopher <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Fran%C3%A7ois_Lyotard">Francois Lyotard</a> and Thierry Chaput became the cultural context-providers for the exhibition &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/exhibitions/lesimmateriaux/">Les Immateriaux</a>&rdquo; at the Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris. They invited thirty artists to collaboratively respond to fifty terms related the topic of the &quot;immaterial.&quot; First, the invited cultural producers, mostly authors, were ask to write a few, brief definitions of the provided words on paper to be collected and saved on a &quot;text saving system&quot; that was given to them. The authors were then networked with each other through these devices, which are not further specified in the documentation. The participants could now decide at free will to contradict, add, or change the existing definitions. Lyotard and Chaput pointed out that they were mainly interested in the way, in which this collaborative writing changed the experience of the act of writing itself. This could be seen as precursor to many collaborative writing projects but it also relates to the writing process on today's free encyclopedia Wikipedia.<br /> &nbsp;      <strong><br />       </strong>In 1987 <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitat_%28video_game%29">Lucas Film's Habitat</a> launched for the Commodore 64 computer as an early and technologically influential online role-playing game and the first attempt to monetize a large-scale virtual community by aiming to profit from charging for its messaging services. In the same year Robert Johansen published his book &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_software">Groupware</a>: Computer Support for Business Teams,&quot; which popularized the term groupware, which, just like Habitat, demonstrates the emergence of networked sociality. <br />       <br />       <strong>The Web as an Altruistic Contribution to Society</strong><br />       In 1988 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Relay_Chat" target="_blank">Internet Relay Chat</a> (IRC) was invented, allowing for seamless real-time exchanges. One year later, Tim Berners-Lee and the Belgian<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Cailliau"> Robert Cailliau</a>, while working at CERN, conceptualized the World Wide Web by submitting &quot;<em>WorldWideWeb: Proposal for a HyperText Project.</em>&quot; Berners-Lee contributed the pillars of the Web: <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML">HTML</a> (HyperText Markup Language), <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Locator">URL</a> (Uniform Resource Locator), and<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypertext_Transfer_Protocol"> HTTP</a> (HyperText Transfer Protocol). Had Tim Berners Lee not provided HTTP as a free and open standard, it is unlikely that the Web would exist in its current form today. This unifying interface of the World Wide Web made it considerably easier for people to form groups on the Internet. At this point in time, Berners-Lee described the World Wide Web &quot;<em>as an altruistic, non-proprietary, vendor-neutral contribution to society.</em>&quot;<br />       <br />       In the late 1980s networking took first steps outside academia and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LambdaMOO">LambdaMOO</a> became a popular online community. It is the oldest and most active MOO, still in operation in 2007. (A <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOO">MOO</a> is a text-based online virtual reality system to which multiple users are connected at the same time.) <br />       <br />       Tom Grundner, an assistant professor for family medicine worked on making community health information public and consequently became the founder of the Cleveland <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-net" target="_blank">Free-Net</a>, which was influential in the development of community-oriented free-nets, which were </span><span class="sizeGreater20">censorship-resistant networks.</span><span class="sizeGreater40"><br /> </span>      <span class="sizeGreater20"><br />       The early 1990s were marked by the increasing use of the term &quot;social software&quot; in expert circles. At the same time, the number of European Internet sites grew from 30,000 in 1990 to 500,000 only two years later. <br />       <br />       By 1990 ARPANET was closed down and transferred to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Science_Foundation_Network" target="_blank">NSFNET</a> (National Science Foundation) and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vint_Cerf" target="_blank">Vint Cerf</a> wrote a long &ldquo;Requiem for the ARPANET&rdquo; which ended with <br />       </span>       <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&ldquo;It was the first, and being the first, as best, </span><br />       <span class="sizeGreater20">But now we lay it down to ever rest.&rdquo; </span><em><br />       </em></blockquote>       <span class="sizeGreater20">At the same time, the libertarian, retired Wyoming cattle rancher and member of The Well, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Perry_Barlow" target="_blank">John Perry Barlow</a>, together with John Gilmore and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_Kapor" target="_blank">Mitch Kapor</a>, founded the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation" target="_blank">Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)</a>, a US-American non-profit advocacy and legal organization dedicated to preserving free speech in the context of today's digital age. In 2004, the EFF took on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_%28anonymity_network%29" target="_blank">Tor project</a>, which is a free software system enabling its users to communicate anonymously on the Internet. Tor is used in authoritarian regimes such as China to help bloggers and human rights activists to anonymize their web browsing and publishing as well as instant messaging.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />       <br />       In 1991, The University of Minnesota launched <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gopher_%28protocol%29" target="_blank">Gopher</a>, the &quot;<em>infoserver that can deliver text, graphics, audio, and multimedia to clients,</em>&quot; which became rapidly popular. While it is unclear how &quot;multimedia&quot; could have been in range for gopher, its goal was to function as an improved form of anonymous FTP, with features similar to that of the World Wide Web. Now that the Web as overarching interface was established, Internet enthusiasts started to believe in a world without borders. In this context Benjamin Anderson's book &quot;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Imagined-Communities-Reflections-Origin-Nationalism/dp/1844670864/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-9385801-7628719?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190849408&sr=8-1" target="_blank">Imagined Communities</a>&quot; became influential. He describes the nation state as an imagined community that is mainly constructed by print media. This world without borders later turned out to be, for the very most part, an illusion. Many social networking sites that will emerge later, will be bound to the nation state. Sites like Orkut or Fotolog will be very specific to a particular country and age group and gender. The Internet is everything but borderless.  <br />       <br />       For a brief period, gopher and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web" target="_blank">World Wide Web</a> (WWW) were competing systems. In 1993, however, CERN projected that the World Wide Web would be without fees: free for anyone to use. Two months later, gopher announced that it was no longer free to use, which pushed users away from gopher to the World Wide Web. The WWW was public domain, which was an additional reason for its success. But the popularization of the Web was sealed on 1993. In 1992 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen" target="_blank">Marc Andreessen</a> (b. 1971), a local 6&rsquo;4&rdquo; undergraduate student at the University of Illinois, working on minimum wage at night, used the protocols for the WWW from CERN to create a more &quot;<em>human interface for the World Wide Web.</em>&quot; Together with other students, Andreessen created the Mosaic browser, which was launched in 1993. The browser made the Web accessible to the non-technical person. This was the single, most significant milestone in the popularization of the Web. In 1993, the WWW experienced a 350 percent growth rate, mainly in United States. <br />       <br />       In 1994 Andreessen, after leaving the University of Illinois, was surprised to find out that the university did not approve off a commercial spin-off of the former student project. Therefore the small student team founded Netscape, and re-wrote the Mosaic code to market their browser. A year and a half later, <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_%28web_browser%29">Mosaic</a> had 1.5 million users. Early versions of Mosaic had a collaboration feature that allowed annotations, which could be shared with a well-defined team of collaborators.<br />       <br />       <strong>Experiments with Internet Freedom</strong><br />       It must have been the utopian dreams that were attached to the Internet that made <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lamborn_Wilson" target="_blank">Peter Lamborn Wilson</a>'s book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/T-Z-Temporary-Autonomous-Autonomedia/dp/1570271518/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-9385801-7628719?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190849520&sr=1-1" target="_blank">Temporary Autonomous Zone</a>, published in 1991, so widely read. Wilson (a.k.a. Hakim Bey, b. 1945) used historical examples to describe the tactic of shaping temporary spaces that elude formal structures of control. The essay inspired Internet pioneers to experiment with the freedoms afforded by Internet.<br />       <br />       In 1991, the NSF allowed commercial use of the Internet, opening the gates for a big bang.&nbsp; Among its first users was the porn industry with first typed interactions with models like &quot;Hello baby.&quot; Quiet geek utopia slowly turned into place of ecstatic market (investment) euphoria, which also led to a wave of amateur users who used email and accessed web pages.&nbsp; In 1995, NSF decommissioned the backbone, leaving the Internet a self-supporting system. The one of the earliest Internet entrepreneurs was the San Francisco-based activist and digital librarian <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster_Kahle" target="_blank">Brewster Kahle</a> (b. 1960) who was part of the company WAIS in 1992.&nbsp; &ldquo;<em>I wanted to prove that you could make an Internet company,</em>&rdquo; he said. After selling WAIS to AOL in May 1995 for $15 million, Kahle and co-founder Gilliat founded the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Archive" target="_blank">Internet Archive</a> and then <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexa_Internet" target="_blank">Alexa</a>. The temporary wealth created by the dotcom bubble was responsible for several altruistic projects later. Kahle&rsquo;s Archive.org is only one example. Ebay founder<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Omidyar" target="_blank"> Pierre Omidyar</a> as well as Amazon.com&rsquo;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Bezos" target="_blank">Jeff Bezos</a> have both launched several large-scale altruistic projects. But there is an additional positive effect of the dotcom bubble. For a short period, a section of the techno-workforce experienced a new kind of work conditions, which were mostly favorable in the sense that the hierarchies in a dotcom company were less pronounced and the work environment was more casual. While many of these knowledge workers lost their job, they took this experience with them when entering the job market again. <br /> &nbsp;       <br />       <strong>The Woodstock of the Web</strong><br />       In 1994 one could order pizza online and the World Wide Web had an explosive almost 350,000 percent expansion rate that year. CERN decides to convene the first web conference in Geneva that year and it was so well attended that not even CERN employees could get in. The conference was later called the Woodstock of the Web and Tim Berners-Lee became a kind of rock star. He mainly outlined a long list of problems that need to be addressed so that &quot;<em>a year or two from we don't have to announce that starting next Tuesday you have to put a 7 in front of the URL.</em>&quot; However, despite this success Berners-Lee could not get sufficient funding from CERN and Europe is administratively too divided to quickly address issues of standardization and commit the necessary funds rapidly. This led Berners-Lee, after much trying, to move the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web_Consortium" target="_blank">W3 Consortium</a> to MIT in Boston (with a strong emphasis, however, on the establishment of an European branch of it).&nbsp; <br />       <br />       In 1993 De Digitale Stad launched as a project by <a href="http://www.debalie.nl/" target="_blank">De Balie</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XS4ALL" target="_blank">XS4ALL</a>. Its goal was the creation of a publicly accessible (free-net) system that would bring politics and citizens together in an online community. Dutch media critic <a href="http://laudanum.net/geert/biography.shtml" target="_blank">Geert Lovink</a> referred to De Digitale Stad (&quot;The Digital City&quot;) as &ldquo;<em>a social experiment in Internet freedom.</em>&ldquo; It was the attempt of staying independent in an increasingly commercial environment. <br />       </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><br /> In the same year, 1993, Peter Steiner published a cartoon in The New Yorker that would be quoted from then on. <em>&quot;<a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.unc.edu/courses/jomc050/idog.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.unc.edu/depts/jomc/academics/dri/idog.html&h=459&w=411&sz=45&hl=en&start=1&sig2=D91hC5fp7wkA47xim468mQ&um=1&tbnid=vLe6_atKpxEJEM:&tbnh=128&tbnw=115&ei=sOz6RrmbCIWQwAH0-ICfCg&prev=/images%3Fq%3DOn%2Bthe%2BInternet,%2Bnobody%2Bknows%2Byou%2527re%2Ba%2Bdog.%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN" target="_blank">On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.</a>&quot;</em> The popularity of this cartoon shows a widespread interest in identity issues in relation to the Internet at the time. </span><span class="sizeGreater20">A year later, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Hall" target="_blank">Justin Hall</a> (b. 1974 in Chicago), is an American freelance journalist, then a Swarthmore College student, who started a web-based diary called Justin's <a href="http://www.links.net/" target="_blank">Links from the Underground</a>, which offered link highlighting (not unlike <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boing_Boing" target="_blank">BoingBoing</a>) and excentric, journaling (e.g., his exploration of &quot;sexuality as a sacred place&quot;). </span><span class="sizeGreater20">This web-based diary is often cited as the first <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog" target="_blank">weblog</a>.</span><span class="sizeGreater20"> Here, based on the feeling of an unlimited right to reveal, Justin wrote about his most intimate experiences, which frequently included delicate details about his (girl)friends, which made many people uncomfortable. They felt that he intruded upon their privacy. <br /> <strong><br /> Ego Surfing</strong><br /> These early years of the Web established it as a site of self-exploration (&quot;<em>I want to feel what it's like to have a web page of my own.</em>&quot;) and the discovery of new channels of social connection. The Web was a novel site where one could expose oneself completely while still being very safe. But this was also the moment that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egosurfing" target="_blank">ego surfing</a> and concerns about computer addiction emerged and new concepts of (disembodied) friendship were problematized. Some of these issues will remain relevant even a decade later but digital identity will be far more evolved, leaving far fewer &quot;dogs&quot; unrecognized on the Net. </span><span class="sizeGreater20">  <br /> <br />       In the same year Amazon.com was founded, spurred by what Jeff Bezos &quot;<em>refers to as his 'regret minimization framework,' i.e. his effort to fend off late-in-life regret for not staking a claim in the Internet gold rush.</em>&rdquo; Amazon's online launch took place a year later, offering users the ability to write reviews and consumer guides. <br />       The artist Douglas Davis who created the <a href="http://www.whitney.org/arport/collection/index.shtml" target="_blank">The World&rsquo;s First Collaborative Sentence</a> in 1994 used a similar interface for web-based self-publishing. Through simple online submission, users could add to an ongoing sentence but were not allowed to end it.<br />       <br />       In 1995 one fifth of all Internet traffic is caused by WWW, taking over ftp&rsquo;s leading role. Microsoft woke up to the Internet that year with Bill gates talking about the &quot;<em>title wave of the Internet</em>.&quot; Coming in late, Microsoft decided to &quot;give away&quot; its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer" target="_blank">Internet Explorer</a> (IE) for &quot;free,&quot; which led to anti-trust law suits for anti-competitive behavior. But &quot;free,&quot; already then was not cost free as users had to have </span><span class="sizeGreater20">Windows, </span><span class="sizeGreater20">Microsoft's platform, to run IE.<br />       <br />       The searchable user classifieds site Craigslist and the auction site eBay started up that year. Craigslist stated on their site: <em>&quot;Ultimately, the information you submit to Craigslist belongs to you. You own your own words.&quot; &quot;[I]n every case Craig [of abuse] will contact the abusive party and ask them to cease.&quot;</em> (Dec 29, 1999) This is one of the first statements of an online service showing an awareness of ownership issues related to user-generated content.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />       <br />       <strong>The Rise of Social Networking Websites</strong><br />       In 1994, the dating site <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Match.com" target="_blank">Match.com</a> launched and social search site <a href="http://Classmates.com" target="_blank">Classmates.com</a> started in order to link up schoolmates, work colleagues and military personnel alike. While the American Classmates.com is often referred to as first social networking site, it was only months later before the Swedish social networking site </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LunarStorm">Lunarstorm</a></span><span class="sizeGreater20"> launched (under a different name). Lunarstorm has 1,2 million users in 2007. This is only one example that shows that the history of the Social Web is by no means an all American story. <br />       <br />       In 1994, the mailing list <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nettime" target="_blank">&lt;Nettime&gt;</a> was created in the &quot;<em>effort to formulate an international, networked discourse that neither promotes a dominant euphoria (to sell products) nor continues the cynical pessimism.</em>&quot; This suggested balance between utopia and dystopia is no less relevant today than it was back then. In addition, The Thing (TT), an Internet Service Provider and media center started up in New York, Berlin, Vienna, Switzerland and the Netherlands. The New York &quot;branch&quot; of TT was spearheaded by Wolfgang Staehle and the BBS of </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><a href="http://thing.net/" target="_blank">The Thing,</a></span><span class="sizeGreater20"> attracted an early cultural community discussing emerging net art as well as politics. Staehle generously supported the work of many artists with free server space. In 2007 TT, NYC moved its servers to Berlin.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />       &nbsp;<br />       Also in 1994 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_Cunningham" target="_blank">Ward Cunningham</a> started developing <a href="http://c2.com/cgi/wiki" target="_blank">WikiWikiWeb</a> and installed it on the Internet a year later, &quot;clearing the way&quot; for Wikipedia down the road. The core idea of WikiWikiWeb was that many users could collaboratively edit a webpage. The name WikiWiki (&quot;fast, fast&quot;) was inspired by the sign on an express bus to the international airport in Honolulu. <br />       <br />       In 1995 the sheer ecstasy of the emerging dotcom industry pushed the development of new services forward while simultaneously creating a group of exuberant dot-commers. Several authors commented on that moment. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ctheory" target="_blank">Arthur Kroker</a> and Michael Weinstein, for example, publish &quot;<a href="http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9601/msg00005.html" target="_blank">Datatrash</a>&quot; in which they claim that the digital communications arena is no longer democratic and that it has been taken over by a virtual class. In the same year <a href="http://www.hrc.wmin.ac.uk/richard.html" target="_blank">Richard Barbrook</a> and Andy Cameron describe what they call the <a href="http://www.alamut.com/subj/ideologies/pessimism/califIdeo_I.html" target="_blank">Californian Ideology</a> as <br /> </span> <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20"> &quot;a new faith [that] has emerged from a bizarre fusion of the cultural bohemianism of San Francisco with the hi-tech industries of Silicon Valley.&quot; &quot;Promoted in magazines, books, TV programs, Web sites, newsgroups and Net conferences, the Californian Ideology promiscuously combines the free-wheeling spirit of the hippies and the entrepreneurial zeal of the yuppies.&quot;</span><br /> </blockquote> <span class="sizeGreater20"> The Californian Ideology simultaneously reflects &quot;<em>the disciplines of market economics and the freedoms of hippie artisanship.</em>&quot; This ideology is alive and well still today.<br />       </span> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span class="sizeGreater20"><strong>Social Bookmarking</strong><br /> <a href="http://list.com" target="_blank">      List.com</a>, the first shared online bookmarking system started up and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICQ">ICQ</a> (Instant Messaging Computer Program) was released and Brewster Kahle launches the non-profit organization The Internet Archive. Also in 1995, the Asian American community site <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AsianAve" target="_blank">AsianAvenue.com</a> kicked off (without social networking features at the time) and <a href="http://personals.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">Yahoo!Personals</a> started as online dating service. In the same year, <a href="http://web.media.mit.edu/%7Epattie/" target="_blank">Pattie Maes</a> (MIT), together with engineers at her Lab, builds one of the first music recommendation systems called HOMR (or Helpful Online Music Recommendation Service), one of the first collaborative music filtering and referral systems preceding services like <a href="http://Last.fm" target="_blank">Last.fm</a>, <a href="http://jango.com" target="_blank">Jango</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandora_%28music_service%29" target="_blank">Pandora</a>. In 1996, <a target="_blank" href="http://Rhizome.org">Rhizome.org</a> was founded with the goal to &ldquo;<em>provide a platform for the global new media art community</em>.&rdquo; The <a href="http://rhizome.org/art/" target="_blank">ArtBase is Rhizome</a>'s rich online archive, predominantly of net art projects.<br />       <br />       Also in 1996 Brewster Kahle's Internet Archive started the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Archive#Wayback_Machine" target="_blank">Wayback Machine.</a> The Wayback Machine originally referred to a machine from the cartoon <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rocky_and_Bullwinkle_Show" target="_blank">The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show</a> in which Mr. Peabody and Sherman would be taken back in time. The Wayback Machine is used to visit web pages from 1996 to the a few months ago that may no longer be available. By 2007, 85 billion web pages are archived.<br />       <br />       In 1996 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Castells" target="_blank">Manuel Castells </a>(b. 1942) publishes the first volume in the trilogy Information Age, titled <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/104-9385801-7628719?ie=UTF8&tag=mozilla-20&index=blended&link%5Fcode=qs&field-keywords=castells&sourceid=Mozilla-search" target="_blank">The Rise of the Information Society</a>. Castells writes that the<br /> </span></p> <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20"> &ldquo;most decisive historical factor accelerating, channeling and shaping the information technology paradigm, and inducing its associated social forms, was/is the process of capitalist restructuring undertaken since the 1980s, so that the new techno-economic system can be adequately characterized as informational capitalism&rdquo; (p18). </span><br /> </blockquote> <p>&nbsp;<span class="sizeGreater20">He argued that in contemporary society dominant functions and processes are increasingly organized around networks. <br />       <br />       Only one year later <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Malda" target="_blank">Rob Malda</a> (a.k.a CmdrTaco, b. 1976) launched<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot" target="_blank"> Slashdot</a>, the first weblog allowing readers to comment and the term &quot;weblog&quot; was coined the American blogger <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorn_Barger" target="_blank">Jorn Barger</a>. Barger (b. 1952) ultimately complains that coining this term did not lead to personal financial gain for him.  The lack of commercial promise that blogs offered at the time was the reason that they did not get much initial mainstream attention.<br />       <br />       The University of Ottawa professor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_L%C3%A9vy" target="_blank">Pierre Levy</a> published his book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Collective-Intelligence-Mankinds-Emerging-Cyberspace/dp/0306456354/ref=pd_bbs_sr_3/104-9385801-7628719?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190851545&sr=8-3" target="_blank">Collective Intelligence</a>, which investigated the affordances of networked sociality, describing an intelligence that emerges from the collaboration, competition of many individuals working on one task. </span></p> <p><span class="sizeGreater20">The massive scaling-up of online sociality and the emergence participatory cultures made this a consequential book. In 1997, <a href="http://subsol.c3.hu/subsol_2/contributors2/garciabio.html" target="_blank">David Garcia</a> and Geert Lovink defined <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_media#Origins_of_Tactical_Media" target="_blank">Tactical Media</a> as &quot;<em>what happens when the cheap &lsquo;do it yourself&rsquo; media, made possible by the revolution in consumer electronics and expanded forms of distribution (from public access cable to the internet) are exploited by groups and individuals who feel aggrieved by or excluded from the wider culture.</em>&quot; By 2002 <a href="http://www.n5m4.org/" target="_blank">Tactical Media Labs</a> had been started in Amsterdam, Sydney, Cluj, Barcelona, Delhi, New York, Singapore, Birmingham, Nova Scotia, Berlin, Chicago, Portsmouth, Sao Paulo, Moscow, Dubrovnik, and Zanzibar. In 2004 the Mídia Tática group in Sao Paolo (Tatiana Wells and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.collectivate.net/journalisms/2007/4/24/ricardo-rosas.html">Ricardo Rosas</a>) established several <a href="http://www.metamute.org/en/Autolabs-Critiquing-Utopia" target="_blank">AutoLabs</a> in this context trying to help the urban poor to use the new resources of the Internet for their own ends.<br />       <br />       In 1998 the business-centered social networking site <a href="http://www.ecademy.com/" target="_blank">Ecademy</a> starts up and <a href="http://www.evite.com/" target="_blank">Evite</a> launches as a website for creating, sending, and managing online invitations. Also at this early point, the Indian social networking site <a href="http://www.sulekha.com/" target="_blank">Sulekha</a> was set into motion. Playahead, a large Internet community mainly for Swedish teenagers, was founded in Helsingborg, Sweden in 1998 and claims to have 1 million members in 2007. <a href="http://www.ecrush.com/" target="_blank">ECrush</a>, today the 10th largest dating site in the United States, was launched in 1999 pre-dating the social networking sites like Friendster, MySpace and Facebook. Sulekha and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playahead">Playahead</a> show that the early history of social networking was not solely an American affair.<br />       <br />       In the same year DMOZ, also known as <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dmoz.org/">The Open Directory Project</a>, is founded under the name GnuHoo. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</a> and the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fsf.org/">Free Software Foundation</a> objected to the usage of Gnu because GnuHoo was a commercial enterprise founded by two SunMicroSystems employees. Consequently, the name GnuHoo was changed to NewHoo. NewHoo/DMOZ/Open Directory Project involves geographically distributed individuals to evaluate websites, creating a user-powered search engine. In October 1999 the number of URLs indexed by ODP reached one million (about 1.6 million by 2000 and four million by 2003). By March 2007 75,151 editors have contributed. The project is later bought by Netscape, which was then acquired by AOL. Volunteer editors lived through &quot;<em>a short-lived attempt by the company at moderation of the ODP Editor Forums, but this effort was abandoned as being the antithesis of the egalitarian principles on which the ODP community was supposed to be based.</em>&quot; There are several example in which editors who questioned editing guidelines had their editing privileges removed by paid staff. <br />       <br />       The French curator and art critic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Bourriaud" target="_blank">Nicolas Bourriaud</a> published <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/103-0808941-0411832?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Relational+Aesthetics&x=16&y=17">Relational Aesthetics</a> engaging with the possibility of &quot;relational art&quot; based on the practices of artists who became visible during the 1990s. Concurrently, the German researcher Peter Hoschka introduced the term<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Web" target="_blank"> Social Web</a>. <br />       <br /> In 1999, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rusty_Foster" target="_blank">Rusty Foster</a> creates <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuro5hin">kuro5hin</a> (pronounced &quot;corrosion&quot;), a weblog where users vote for the content that goes onto the front page. The computer programmer <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shawn_Fanning" target="_blank">Shawn Fanning</a> (b. 1980) writes <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napster">Napster</a> at Northeastern University with his friend Sean Parker. Users of Napster could download the free program to search the hard disks of other users for Mp3 files, which could then be downloaded directly from those peers. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) sued Napster in December 1999, which was followed by the heavy metal band Metallica filing a lawsuit against the company in 2000. During the last months of Napster&rsquo;s operation in 2001, several other file-sharing programs emerged including <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazaa">Kazaa</a> and Gnutella, which allowed users to continue to share music files. Napster was important as it established expectations-- information wants to be free. It demonstrated the power of peer-to-peer systems (i.e., in August 2001 alone, 3.1 billion files were exchanged via Napster). <br />       <br />       In the same year <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyra_Labs">Pyra Labs</a> start <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blogger_%28service%29">Blogger.com</a>, and social networking sites including <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribe">Tribe</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xanga">Xanga</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.blackplanet.com/">Blackplanet</a> launch. By 2007 the latter will have 16 million users, mainly African Americans.<br /> <br />       </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><strong>The DotCom Crash and Massive Offshoring</strong><br /></span><span class="sizeGreater20">Throughout the 1990s, California became the center of the biggest economic boom since the gold rush of 1848 that brought some 300,000 people from all over the world. In the 1990s many highly skilled Indian programmers started to work for dotcom companies twelve thousand miles away from <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_Valley">Silicon Valley</a>, in Bangalore. Silicon Valley weas responsible for 13% of the new American jobs created between 1996 and 2000. In 1995, the cross-platform software language JAVA, a &quot;building material&quot; for software, was written at SunMicro Systems, named after coffee, Silicon Valley's favorite beverage. <br />       <br />All of this happened against the backdrop of a starting backlash of technology stocks in the financial markets, which indicated what later became known as the <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble">Dotcom Crash</a>. The flashy <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/search/?sourceid=mozilla-search%22&q=webbyawards.com">WebbyAwards</a> exemplify the &ldquo;dotcom bubble&rdquo;. Since 1995, it brought together thousands of people in costumes, with hired faux-paparazzi to make people feel important. The Internet was predicted to be the quick replacement of the post office, the fast way to cash in on markets all over the world. The perceptions of the evolution of markets on the Web were exaggerated. Venture capitalists (VC) poured millions into companies that had given up traditional business models, which led to some spectacular failures. For two years, 2001 and 2002, investment in startups was at a minimum. In 2003 Accel, a leading venture capital started funding startup businesses again. Accel's president James Breyer demanded that Accel companies need to have at least half of their workers based overseas. He said:<br /></span></p><blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&quot;If a company is not actively investing in China and India, they need to provide a very compelling case to board members as to why they are not.&quot;</span><br /></blockquote><p><span class="sizeGreater20"> In the years after the dotcom crash, the parking lots of Silicon Valley were empty and programmers took jobs with much lower wages in the non-profit area, creating open source software. &nbsp;  <br /><strong><br />      The Rise of Citizen Media</strong><br /> <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indymedia">      IndyMedia</a> launched during the protests against the <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Organization">World Trade Organization</a> (WTO) in Seattle in November 1999. The motivation for its creation was the realization that the media would not accurately report demonstrations of the pro-democratic globalization movement. Indymedia made a difference by allowing anyone to write the news. It became an early example of participatory citizen media, offering an alternative to corporate media. Today, Indymedia sites all over the world use Mir, a JAVA-based open-source content management system. Consequently it became clear that the Internet was a valuable tool for organizing, fundraising, lobbying, and community building.<br />       <br />       Also in 1999, the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.rtmark.com/">RTMark</a> site kicked off. &ldquo;<em>RTMark is itself a registered corporation which brings together activists who plan projects with donors who fund them. It thus operates outside the laws governing human individuals, and benefits from the much looser laws governing corporations.&rdquo;</em> RTMark was participatory in the sense that it functions as matchmaker between anti-corporate activists and anti-corporate donors leading to projects such as the <a href="http://sniggle.net/barbie.php" target="_blank">Barbie Liberation Organization</a>.<br />       <br />       In 2000, the international online artistic community <a target="_blank" href="http://www.deviantart.com/">DeviantArt</a>, the social networking site <a target="_blank" href="http://www.faceparty.com/">Faceparty</a>, and <a target="_blank" href="http://irc-galleria.net/index.php">IRC-Galleria</a> launched. The latter will become the largest web-based virtual community in Finland. Faceparty, which has 5.9 million users in 2007, mainly focuses on British teens and 20-somethings. The peer-to-peer file sharing application <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazaa" target="_blank">Kazaa</a> was created that year and the South Korean social news site <a target="_blank" href="http://english.ohmynews.com/">OhMyNews</a> launches. Despite the international accessibility of social networking sites like Faceparty, their actual user-group is often very specific to a geographic region and even age group.&nbsp; <br />       <br />       In December, the private, non-commercial working group RSS-Dev Group released its <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_%28file_format%29">RSS</a> 1.0 specification, allowing users to &quot;feed&quot; or &quot;aggregate&quot; websites in a so called RSS aggregator, a piece of software allowing them to follow changes such as new posts on many websites at once without actually having to visit them.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />       <br />       In 2001, the <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Media_Lab">MIT Sociable Media Group</a> was formed and several vital mailing lists launched including <a target="_blank" href="http://post.openoffice.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre">SPECTRE</a> (&quot;<em>an unmoderated mailing list for media art and culture in Deep Europe</em>&quot;) and the list of <a href="http://aoir.org/" target="_blank">The Association of Internet Researchers</a>.<br />       <br />       The terrorist suicide attacks of September 11, 2001 led to a widespread change in approaches of the US government to privacy, including the installation of the FBI's email surveillance system known as &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore_%28FBI%29">Carnivore</a>&rdquo; on many Internet Service Providers. <br />       <br />       A dropout of the State University of New York at Buffalo, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bram_Cohen" target="_blank">Bram Cohen</a> (b. 1975) later developed the peer-to-peer file sharing communications protocol BitTorrent, which is first implemented on July 2, 2001. Cohen designed <a href="http://www.bittorrent.com/" target="_blank">BitTorrent</a> to be able to speed up the download time, especially for users with fast download and upload speeds. The more popular a file is, the faster a user will be able to download it. In 2007, according to Cohen, BitTorrent has 135 million installs and accounts for 55 percent of all Internet traffic.<br /> </span><span class="sizeGreater20"><strong><br /> The Amateur/Expert </strong></span><br /> <span class="sizeGreater20">      Concurrently, social networking sites like Cyworld Sites, DeadJournal, Fr&uuml;hst&uuml;ckstreff, <a href="http://www.passado.com/index.aspx" target="_blank">Passado</a>, and <a href="http://www.ryze.com/" target="_blank">Ryze</a> are created. Former editor-in-chief of <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nupedia">Nupedia</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizendium">Citizendium</a> founder <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Sanger">Larry Sanger</a> (b. 1968) and the American Internet entrepreneur<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales"> Jimmy Wales</a> (b. 1966) create Wikipedia in 2000/2001. Wikipedia's spectular success demonstrates the power of collective intelligence and also took away a certain amount of power from established experts who are not the sole authorities anymore. <br /> <br /> In addition, the weblog publishing system <a href="http://www.movabletype.org/" target="_blank">Movable Type</a> was released. Around the same time political scientist Robert D. Putnam publishes <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/104-9385801-7628719?ie=UTF8&tag=mozilla-20&index=blended&link%5Fcode=qs&field-keywords=Bowling%20Alone&sourceid=Mozilla-search" target="_blank">Bowling Alone</a>: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, describing the decline of social capital in the United States. In the US, he describes the decline in civic participation, religious participation (churches), civic participation, altruism, reciprocity, workplace participation (union membership declines), informal connections, and political participation (voting, running for office). While Putnam's definition of social capital is </span><span class="sizeGreater20">problematic </span><span class="sizeGreater20">and his examples are old-fashioned, he does notice the mentioned decline of social capital but simultaneously describes a rapid growth of small niche communities and self-help groups. <br />       <br /> <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Heiferman">      Scott Heiferman</a> (co-founder of the social networking site <a href="http://Meetup.com" target="_blank">Meetup.com</a>) traces the inspiration to create Meetup.com in 2002 back to Putnam's book. &quot;<em>The primary inspiration was the book Bowling Alone... We are providing a service that revitalizes the Internet for local communities.</em>&quot; The site became especially know for its role in Howard Dean's presidential campaign. In 2005 Meetup.com requires organizers to pay for local groups leading to a drastic drop in local groups but in 2007 it still has two million users.<br />       <br />       Also in 2002 social sites like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friendster" target="_blank">Friendster</a> and the Hungarian social networking site <a href="http://iwiw.hu/pages/user/login.jsp" target="_blank">iWiW</a> started. The social networking site <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last.fm" target="_blank">Last.fm</a> (based on music) set a positive standard for privacy and transparency by stating in their Terms of Service in 2002.<br />       </span>      </p> <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&ldquo;We have a pretty simple privacy policy. We are reasonably sure this won't piss anyone off. We won't pass your email address on to anyone, not even Lars Ulrich at gunpoint. Your pseudonymous listening habit data will be available to other Last.fm users for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons license. ... We reserve the right to sell or license pseudonymous listening data for commercial use ...&rdquo;</span><em><em><br />       </em></em></blockquote>       <span class="sizeGreater20"><em>      </em>In the same year the blog search engine Technorati launched and the photo-sharing site Flickr was co-founded by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caterina_Fake" target="_blank">Caterina Fake</a> in Canada. It has a repository that in 2007 is quickly approaching 1 billion images. In January 2007, Flickr announced that the &quot;Old Skool&quot; members, those that pre-date the Yahoo acquisition in 2005, would be required to associate their account with a Yahoo ID. Users such as Jimmy Wales did not want to associate with Yahoo but were now forced to do so if they wanted to keep using Delicious. They criticized this move.<br />       <br />       Also in 2002, the American economist and urban studies theorist <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Florida">Richard Florida</a> published the controversial The Rise of the Creative Class. He writes:<em><br />       </em></span>       <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&ldquo;This young man had spiked multi-colored hair, full-body tattoos, and multiple piercings in his ears. An obvious slacker, I thought, probably in a band. 'So what is your story?' I asked. 'Hey man, I just signed on with these guys.' ... This young man and his lifestyle proclivities represent a profound new force in the economy and life of America. He is a member of what I call the creative class: a fast growing, highly educated, and well-paid segment of the workforce on whose efforts corporate profits and economic growth increasingly depend. Members of the creative class do a wide variety of work in a wide variety of industries--from technology to entertainment, journalism to finance, high-end manufacturing to the arts. They do not consciously think of themselves as a class. Yet they share a common ethos that values creativity, individuality, difference, and merit.&rdquo; </span><em><br />       </em></blockquote>       <span class="sizeGreater20">Also in 2002 the <a href="http://www.subtle.net/empyre/" target="_blank">-empyre--</a> list was launched by the Australian networked media artist, writer and curator <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melinda_Rackham">Melinda Rackham</a>. Empyre became an important forum for the discussion of media art. The information architect <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Vander_Wal">Thomas Vander Wal</a> uses the term <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy" target="_blank">folksonomy</a> to describe socially created taxonomies. Howard Rheingold published Smart Mobs while in November 2002 the American writer, consultant and teacher <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clay_Shirky">Clay Shirky</a> organized the &quot;<a href="http://www.picpix.com/brad/gallery/0008kcbx" target="_blank">Social Software Summit</a>&quot; further popularizing the term &quot;social software.&quot;<br />       The transnational <a target="_blank" href="http://thistuesday.org/node/130">Frassanito Network</a> collaboratively authored an essay &quot;The Precariat&quot; in which they state that<em><br />       </em></span>       <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&ldquo;Precarious work refers to all possible shapes of unsure, not guaranteed, flexible exploitation: from illegalized, seasonal and temporary employment to homework, flex- and temp-work to subcontractors, freelancers or so called self employed persons.&rdquo; </span><em><br />       </em></blockquote>       <span class="sizeGreater20">In the years to come the ideas surrounding the term of the precariat were applied to new labor conditions created by a networked lifestyle. Corporations increasingly realized that openness helps them to draw in users who then start to work for them either for free or for a minimum wage. In addition, and even more importantly, entrepreneurs appreciated that these thousands of users and producers were in no way organized (e.g., in a union). They work the net as kind of second job after hours. &nbsp;  <br />       <br />       The Dutch media critic Geert Lovink published &quot;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/104-9385801-7628719?ie=UTF8&tag=mozilla-20&index=blended&link%5Fcode=qs&field-keywords=Dark%20Fiber&sourceid=Mozilla-search" target="_blank">Dark Fiber</a>,&quot; in which he presents rare case studies of critical Internet culture such as Digitale Stad. Also in 2002 the US-based media-sharing site Fotolog is launched. It will gain a solid user base of over ten million users throughout South America (Chile, Argentina, Brazil). The approach of the site to content ownership shifted over the years of its existence. In 2005 the terms of service state: &ldquo;<em>It is Fotolog's policy to respect the privacy of Members. Therefore, Fotolog will not disclose to any third party Member's name or contact information. Fotolog will also not monitor, edit, or disclose the contents of a Member's information...</em>&rdquo; but just two years later this is modified to say: &ldquo;<em>All content posted by a member is the property of the member that posted such content.</em>&rdquo; <br />       <br /> <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Schachter">      Joshua Schachter </a>(b. 1974), at the time a programmer for the financial service firm Morgan Stanley, develops the social bookmarking service Delicious in his spare time and launches it in 2003. A friend of Schachter referred to finding good links as &ldquo;eating cherries&rdquo; and that led to the &quot;Delicious&quot; metaphor. Yahoo will acquire it in 2005. By 2007, Delicious will have 3 million users and 10 million bookmarks.<br />       <br />       In 2003 many social tools including social networking and dating and social bookmarking sites launched:<a href="http://www.codingmonkeys.de/subethaedit/" target="_blank"> SubEthaEdit</a>, first released under the name Hydra (the collaborative real-time editor). SubEthaEdit offers collaboration-enhancing features that would have been extremely expensive in the past.<br />       <br />       Concurrently, two professional networking sites (<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/" target="_blank">LinkedIn</a> and OpenBC- later called XING) emerge. Linkedin will have 13 million users by 2007 but, strangely, it is&nbsp; nearly impossible to remove one's profile from LinkedIn. There is no automated way; the official method is to file a customer support ticket. While LinkedIn is mainly used in North America, the German site Xing dominates in Europe and the Far East. Both networks are build on what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Granovetter" target="_blank">Mark Granovetter</a> called weak ties. In 1973, in his book &quot;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Getting-Job-Study-Contacts-Careers/dp/0226305813/ref=sr_1_1/104-9385801-7628719?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190853351&sr=1-1" target="_blank">Getting a Job</a>&quot; Granovetter argued that within a social network, weak ties are more powerful than strong ones. He showed that most people got jobs because of their weak ties instead of their strong ones. <br />       <br />       In the same year the social networking site MySpace as well as the virtual world SecondLife are introduced. The former will become the most culturally influential social networking platform in the history of the Internet to date with about two hundred million users. According to freelance writer Trent Lapinski &quot;<em>MySpace was actually created by executives whose backgrounds are anchored in spam and mass marketing... [and] essential to the creation of MySpace is current CEO Chris DeWolfe.</em>&rdquo; As a source close to DeWolfe at Xdrive put it:<em><br />       </em></span>       <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&quot;DeWolfe learned that people will sign up for almost anything that they find useful, and they could care less about the fine print.&quot; Spam became a central &quot;feature&quot; of MySpace,which, in 2006, makes it abundantly clear that &quot;the company has 'a non-exclusive, fully-paid and royalty-free, worldwide license ... to use, copy, modify, adapt, translate, publicly perform, publicly display, store, reproduce, transmit, and distribute' all content uploaded to their site.&rdquo;&nbsp; </span><em><br />       </em></blockquote>       <span class="sizeGreater20">In June 2003, Google starts its <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/login/en_US/?gsessionid=wB5tg9cMAHs" target="_blank">Adsense</a> program, allowing many individual bloggers to monetize traffic on their site. Very few, however, will ever be able to make a living this way.<br />       <em><br /> </em>      In this year the persistent growth of user-contributed content became evident and the practice of podcasting became popular among advanced suers. Podcasters' web sites can be syndicated, subscribed to, and downloaded automatically, using an aggregator or feed reader capable of reading feed formats such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_%28file_format%29" target="_blank">RSS</a>. Wikipedia reported 100,000 articles, and <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/" target="_blank">LiveJournal</a> and Friendster each hit 1 million accounts. There was no peak of contribution of articles to the English version of Wikipedia that year but there persistent growth. Also in 2003, the Kazaa founders Swedish <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklas_Zennstr%C3%B6m" target="_blank">Niklas Zennstr&ouml;m</a> (b. 1966) and the Danish <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_Friis" target="_blank">Janus Friis</a> (b. 1976) released the peer-to-peer Internet telephony network Skype. It was significant that in a well-organized effort, 8-30 million people in 800 cities worldwide simultaneously showed their defiance of the war in Iraq on <em>February 15, 2003</em>. While this international resistance did not stop the war (the first American bombs drop on Baghdad on March 19 and the invasion started a day later), it demonstrated the ability to mobilize millions of people worldwide in real time, something that --on that scale -- had no precedence, and would have been hard to imagine without the organizational possibilities that the Internet affords. <br /> <br /> With blogging tools widely available by now, this was also the time in which the anonymous Iraq blogger <a href="http://dear_raed.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Salam Pax </a>started to report, with a good sense of humor, not just about the months leading up to the war and after, but also about his favorite music, from Massive Attack to Bjork. His blog enraged and excited many in the West who commented on it.<br />       <br />       Howard Dean demonstrated forcefully that the Social Web can have an impact on &quot;real life&quot; through his use of weblogs and the content management system &quot;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CivicSpace" target="_blank">Deanspace</a>,&quot; which was launched by &quot;social entrepreneur&quot; <a href="http://zacker.org/about" target="_blank">Zack Rosen</a> and self-pronounced &quot;Drupal hacker&quot; <a href="http://drupal.org/user/3064" target="_blank">Neil Drumm</a> in 2004. It led 100,000 supporters to congregate all-over the United States. Concurrently, Albert-László Barabási published Linked: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Linked-Everything-Connected-Else-Means/dp/0452284392" target="_blank">How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else </a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Linked-Everything-Connected-Else-Means/dp/0452284392" target="_blank">and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life</a>. Barabási thinks of cocktail parties, terrorist cells, ancient bacteria, and international conglomerates as networks. Networks in computer science, ecology, molecular biology, and quantum physics, according to Barabási have much in common and can inform us about online communities and social networks. <br />       <br />       In 2003, three graduates of Stanford University create the &ldquo;free,&rdquo; ad-supported wiki was founded <a href="http://pbwiki.com/" target="_blank">PeanutButterWiki</a> (PbWiki) with their misleading market slogan &quot;<em>Make a free wiki as easily as a peanut butter sandwich!</em>&quot; Users pay by tolerating the ads on their wikis. <br />       <br />       In the same year, significantly more services launched than in years prior. Many of the social networking sites that started at that time are still in use. Deanspace and the organization of the worldwide demonstration against the war Iraq on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_15,_2003_anti-war_protest" target="_blank">February 15</a> showed, for the first time, how the Social Web can significantly influence real life politics. At this point it is also apparent that new social tools are now widely available and their use is simple enough to encourage widespread participation. The increased number of articles on Wikipedia and accounts on LiveJournals and Friendster show that the ongoing growth of the scale of participatory behavior was perceived as less fragile. <br />       <br />       <strong>Who Innovates?</strong><br />       Following the details of the mentioned startups in 2003 it is clear that young, talented programmers start up innovative services and are then (often quickly) bought up by the large corporations that have the resources to support large-scale sociality. Given the examples of Skype, Pbwiki, Kazaa, and <a href="http://www.joost.com/" target="_blank">Joost</a>, it is apparent that the impulse to start up a new innovative service often seems to come from graduate students or recently graduated technologists. There are, however, a few exceptions (e.g., MySpace). <br />       <br />       In opposition to widespread belief, Americans are not the sole creators of popular services for the Social Web. The World Wide Web itself was conceived in Switzerland. The founders of Kaaza, Skype, and Joost were Danish and Swedish. Suleksha, an Indian social networking site, was created in 1998. Many of the social networking sites that became popular in the United States were too culturally American to catch on in India or the rest of Asia. Other sites, developed in the United States, predominantly caught on in South America, for example. Sites like Orkut, are technologically situated in the United States but are almost exclusively culturally embedded in countries like India and Brazil.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />       <br />       In 2004 Webster makes &quot;weblog&quot; word of the year and the undergraduate student <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zuckerberg" target="_blank">Mark Zuckerberg</a> (b. 1984) starts the social networking site Facebook at Harvard University. The site's privacy agreement in September 2007 states. <br />       </span>       <blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&quot;We may use information about you that we collect from other sources, including but not limited to newspapers and Internet sources such as blogs, instant messaging services and other users of Facebook, to supplement your profile.&quot; </span><br />       </blockquote>       <span class="sizeGreater20"><a href="http://www.care2.com/" target="_blank">      Care2</a>, a social activism with 7, 74 million users in 2007, also launched in 2004, states in stark contrast to the Facebook policies: <br /> <em>      &ldquo;Care2 does not claim ownership of Content you submit or make available for inclusion on the Service ... &ldquo;</em><br />       <br />       In 2004, at Canada's <em>&quot;Amazon.ca review system revealed that many well-established authors were anonymously giving themselves glowing reviews, with some revealed to be anonymously giving &lsquo;rival&rsquo; authors terrible reviews. The glitch in the system was fixed and those reviews have since been removed or made anonymous.&rdquo;</em> In March 2006 a search of Amazon.com's books using the word &quot;abortion&quot; turned up pages with the question, &quot;<em>Did you mean adoption?,</em>&rdquo; which caused much controversy and was caused by the companies search algorithm, which they subsequently changed.&nbsp; <br />       <br />       In the same year, set up by eBay founder <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Omidyar">Pierre Omidyar </a>(b. 1967), the <a href="http://www.omidyar.net/" target="_blank">Omidyar network'</a>s stated mission is to &quot;<em>enable individual self-empowerment on a global scale</em>&quot; and employ &quot;<em>business as a tool for social good.</em>&quot;&nbsp; The Omidyar network funds not solely &quot;<em>non-profit projects, but also for-profit ventures and public initiatives they believe promote individual self-empowerment.</em>&quot; In 2004 the network supported the open source repository SourceForge.net with $400,000. But by mid-2007 it was suddenly (and without clear reason) announced that while the site is &quot;<em>useful and successful</em>,&quot; it will shut down at the end of 2007.<br />       </span> <p>&nbsp;<br /> <span class="sizeGreater20"><strong>Users Align in Protest<br /> </strong>In 2004 it has been reported that the top 100 users of the referral site Digg control 56 percent of Digg's front page content and that a niche group of just twenty individuals had submitted 25percent of the front page content. Later, in May 2007, an article appeared on Digg&rsquo;s homepage that contained the encryption key for the AACS digital rights management protection of HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc. Digg, removed the submissions and banned contributors. Many users saw the removals as a capitulation to corporate interests and an assault on free speech. The Digg community staged a widespread revolt. One of the Digg users referred to it as a &quot;<a href="http://www.reedmedia.eu/blog/?p=40" target="_blank">Digital Boston Tea Party</a>.&quot; The response by Digg founder <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Rose">Kevin Rose</a>:<br />       </span>      </p><p> </p><blockquote><span class="sizeGreater20">&ldquo;[A]fter seeing hundreds of stories and reading thousands of comments, you&rsquo;ve made it clear. You&rsquo;d rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger company. We hear you, and effective immediately we won&rsquo;t delete